Following Through With Casework (Fall 2021 AMC 12A #24)
Not following through with a problem may be the most difficult pitfall to avoid. Try the problem below (it's casework) and try to follow through with all cases.
Fall 2021 AMC 12A #24
Problem: Convex quadrilateral ABCD has AB = 18, \angle{A} = 60^\circ, and \overline{AB} \parallel \overline{CD}. In some order, the lengths of the four sides form an arithmetic progression, and side \overline{AB} is a side of maximum length. The length of another side is a. What is the sum of all possible values of a?
Solution: We see that the sides of ABCD must have side lengths x, x+d, x+2d, x+3d to form an arithmetic sequence with difference d \geq 0. Since \overline{AB} has the maximum length, we have that AB = x+3d = 18, with 3! = 6 ways to arrange the other sides of length x, x+d, and x+2d.
From the diagram, we can relate the length of AB to the length of CD because the distance between the two parallel sides is the same at all points. So, our equation becomes AB = \frac{1}{2}AD + CD \pm \sqrt{CB^2-\frac{3}{4}AD^2} depending on the location of C, which can be rewritten by isolating \pm \sqrt{CB^2-\frac{3}{4}AD^2} and squaring, giving us \left(AB - \left(\frac{1}{2}AD + CD\right)\right)^2 = CB^2-\frac{3}{4}AD^2
Case 1: AD = x, CD = x+d, BC = x+2d. We have \left((x+3d)-(\frac{x}{2} + (x+d))\right)^2 = (x+2d)^2-\frac{3}{4}x^2
Case 2: AD = x, CD = x+2d, BC = x+d. We get \left((x+3d)-(\frac{x}{2} + (x+2d))\right)^2 = (x+d)^2-\frac{3}{4}x^2
Case 3: AD = x+d, CD = x, BC = x+2d. We have \left((x+3d)-(\frac{x+d}{2} + x)\right)^2 = (x+2d)^2-\frac{3}{4}(x+d)^2
Case 4: AD = x+d, CD = x+2d, BC = x. We get \left((x+3d)-(\frac{x+d}{2} + (x+2d))\right)^2 = x^2-\frac{3}{4}(x+d)^2
Case 5: AD = x+2d, CD = x, BC = x+d. We have \left((x+3d)-(\frac{x+2d}{2} + x)\right)^2 = (x+d)^2-\frac{3}{4}(x+2d)^2
Case 6: AD = x+2d, CD = x+d, BC = x. We get \left((x+3d)-(\frac{x+2d}{2} + (x+d))\right)^2 = x^2-\frac{3}{4}(x+2d)^2
So, in all, we have the sum of possible values of a = 18 + 3 + 8 + 13 + 12+14+16 = 84.
So yes, definitely a tedious problem, but it's worth working through and most importantly, following through.
Comments
Post a Comment